<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Chris Peterson &#187; chatroulette</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cpeterson.org/tag/chatroulette/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cpeterson.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 02:47:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Dispatches From The Front: 12 Hours On ChatRoulette</title>
		<link>http://www.cpeterson.org/2010/02/12/dispatches-from-the-front-12-hours-on-chatroulette/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cpeterson.org/2010/02/12/dispatches-from-the-front-12-hours-on-chatroulette/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chatroulette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpeterson.org/?p=233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can&#8217;t stand a lot of popular (and, sadly, sometimes scholarly) writing about cyberspace. So much of it is breathless hype, superficial snapshots, and baseless theoretical wankery. For example, when Second Life was booming, a lot of people were writing a lot of things about its business and investment potential, without ever having once walked [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t stand a lot of popular (and, sadly, sometimes scholarly) writing about cyberspace. So much of it is breathless hype, superficial snapshots, and baseless theoretical wankery.</p>
<p>For example, when Second Life was booming, a lot of people were writing a lot of things about its business and investment potential, without ever having once walked around in it. That&#8217;s a critical difference, because you stop thinking about Second Life as next international marketplace the first time you&#8217;re caged and accosted by an anthropomorphic fox, endowed in a diverse, imaginative, and physically impossible manner. The data tell a different story.</p>
<p>Now, people like <a href="http://www.eszter.com/">Eszter Hargittai</a> have been diving deep into the data for years. But the great thing is that now everyone is doing it.</p>
<p>Take, for example, <a href="http://chatroulette.com/">ChatRoulette.</a> ChatRoulette is a service whereby any two users with webcams can be randomly assigned to one another. You log in, you click go, boom, you&#8217;re chatting with another random user.</p>
<p>Now, just from that, I might imagine all sorts of things about ChatRoulette. I might characterize ChatRoulette as the next wave in deliberative discourse, allowing individuals from different backgrounds and cultures to talk face to face in a totally unscripted and unforced fashion. I might prophesize an even smaller global village, where people could simply reach out to one another, connect, say hello, and find out that hey, someone cares. I could create all manner of handwaving, hypothetical bullshit.</p>
<p>Luckily, we have data. Not drawn from any peer-reviewed journal. This is ChatRoulette, as documented by one intrepid, devoted, and bored <a href="http://www.reddit.com/user/GriftyGrifter">reddit user</a>, who spent 12 hours on the site and <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/WTF/comments/b18tp/12_hrs_on_chatroulette_the_stats/">posted the results:</a></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em><strong>1276 cams viewed</strong></em></p>
<ul style="padding-left: 30px;">
<li><em>Conversations 34</em></li>
<li><em>Avg. Conversation Duration: 23.7 sec</em></li>
<li><em>Long: 5 min 56 sec</em></li>
<li><em>298 naked masturbating men</em></li>
<li><em>678 non masturbating males</em></li>
<li><em>152 fake cams</em></li>
<li><em>148 females or mixed m/f</em></li>
<li><em>boobs shown you ask? 0.0</em></li>
<li><em> Cum shots: 2</em></li>
<li><em>man having sex with racoon viewed 23 times</em></li>
<li><em>not counted: repeats, no cam, empty rooms people with dolls and signs.</em></li>
</ul>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>Edit: I generally waited untill the other person switched the cam, although for fake vids I switched the cam Edit: Logged on and saw my first legit real girl with exposed breasts. Final Edit: will log 12 more hrs. after my show to get a complete 24 hr sample.</em></p>
<p>This, ladies and gents, is what good Internet research and analysis looks like. So thank you to the brave few on the front lines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cpeterson.org/2010/02/12/dispatches-from-the-front-12-hours-on-chatroulette/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

